<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.designnine.com/news" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Policy and regulation</title>
 <link>http://www.designnine.com/news/taxonomy/term/14</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Monticello, Minnesota telecom lawsuit dismissed</title>
 <link>http://www.designnine.com/news/node/1234</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A lawsuit filed by the incumbent telephone company in Monticello, Minnesota sought to stop the city from building its own fiber to the home (FTTH) network.  The project was designed as a public/private partnership, with Hiawatha Broadband Communications, another Minnesota telecom firm, signed up to operate the system and provide services.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yesterday, the 10th District Court in Minnesota dismissed the case, finding that the city had the right to issue bonds for a telecom utility and that the city had the right to operate a telecom utility.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Court went into some detail about the meaning of a &quot;public convenience,&quot; as there is a Minnesota law on the books that gives municipalities the right to own and operate a &quot;public convenience.&quot;  Part of the lawsuit alleged that a fiber network was not a public convenience, but the court has said that it is.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This ruling applies only in Minnesota, but it still may have some influence in other states.  Monticello was particularly lucky, as the case was resolved in less than a year.  Courts have generally found in favor of municipalities, but the cases often drag on for years.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.designnine.com/news/node/1234#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.designnine.com/news/taxonomy/term/14">Policy and regulation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.designnine.com/news/taxonomy/term/24">Minnesota</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 11:15:02 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>acohill</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1234 at http://www.designnine.com/news</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>End user agreements give away your rights</title>
 <link>http://www.designnine.com/news/node/1213</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;With the release of Chrome, the new Web browser from Google, a side story has developed, as it appears that the End User License Agreement (EULA) for Chrome gives &lt;a&gt;Google an irrevocable right to use any content&lt;/a&gt; you might post using the Chrome browser.  As it turns out, the legal language in the Chrome EULA is cut and pasted from Google&#039;s other EULAs, including the Google services like their word processor and spreadsheet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So anything you write using the Google word processor, Google immediately has a license to use, in perpetuity.  That would include novels, short stories, business plans, school reports, news stories, blog postings, podcasts, videos--everything becomes the property of Google.  It&#039;s a nonexclusive license, meaning you can still do whatever you like with it, but if you write the great American novel with the Google word processor, they can print it and sell it in direct competition with you.  They can make a copy of your company business plans and sell it on the Web to competitors.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is still no such thing as a free lunch.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Update:  Google has amended the Chrome EULA to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macworld.com/article/135362/2008/09/chrome_useragreement.html&quot;&gt;remove the clause&lt;/a&gt; that gives them the rights to content.  But the problem still remains with other Google apps and services.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.designnine.com/news/node/1213#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.designnine.com/news/taxonomy/term/14">Policy and regulation</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 06:50:39 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>acohill</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1213 at http://www.designnine.com/news</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Can covered bonds build telecom for communities?</title>
 <link>http://www.designnine.com/news/node/1199</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;U.S. Treasury Secretary Paulson has endorsed &quot;covered bonds,&quot; which are a new idea in the United States but have been used in Europe for centuries, according to this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/covered_bonds_can_rebuild_america_7659&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. Covered bonds are secured by loans carried on the books of the issuing bank.  Keeping the loans on the books forces the bank to pay attention to the performance of those loans, unlike the mortgage mess, where mortgages were packaged, re-packaged, and sold until no one really knew how the mortgages were performing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Covered bonds can be used as an investment vehicle for issuing mortgages, but in Europe, they have been used heavily by the public sector to finance infrastructure, and are backed by the governments receiving the funds.  Why are they different than general obligation bonds?  Covered bonds enable local governments to tap a much larger, global marketplace of capital funds, meaning more cash could be available for local infrastructure projects at lower rates because of increased competition among lenders.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.designnine.com/news/node/1199#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.designnine.com/news/taxonomy/term/14">Policy and regulation</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 05:49:22 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>acohill</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1199 at http://www.designnine.com/news</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NATOA calls for local government action, fiber</title>
 <link>http://www.designnine.com/news/node/1192</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors (NATOA) has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.natoa.org/2008/07/natoa-announces-adoption-of-br.html&quot;&gt;called for a range of policy changes and investments&lt;/a&gt; that includes a guaranteed right for local governments to invest in broadband and fiber as the preferred mode of access.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.designnine.com/news/node/1192#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.designnine.com/news/taxonomy/term/1">Broadband</category>
 <category domain="http://www.designnine.com/news/taxonomy/term/14">Policy and regulation</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:05:46 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>acohill</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1192 at http://www.designnine.com/news</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comcast in trouble over service blocking</title>
 <link>http://www.designnine.com/news/node/1186</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Comcast has been reprimanded by the FCC for &lt;a href=&quot;http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080711/internet_regulation.html?.v=5&quot;&gt;blocking certain Internet services&lt;/a&gt; without telling customers and without regard for the level of use.  Service providers can be as arbitrary as they like in managing their Internet access services, but they have to tell customer what they are doing.  A service-based network would not need to penalize customers for doing something they enjoy, but they would probably pay more.  Today&#039;s broadband model is upside down for service providers because they make the most money when a customer never turns their computer on; they make the least if the customer is on the Internet all day long.  That is the exact opposite of every other business in the world, and it&#039;s why broadband is such a mess in the U.S. Fortunately, communities like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ndanville.net&quot;&gt;Danville&lt;/a&gt;, Virginia are changing that model.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.designnine.com/news/node/1186#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.designnine.com/news/taxonomy/term/14">Policy and regulation</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 07:12:01 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>acohill</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1186 at http://www.designnine.com/news</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>FCC provides new definitions of broadband</title>
 <link>http://www.designnine.com/news/node/1180</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The FCC has finally released &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lastmileonline.com/index/siteblog-post-action/id.45/title.fcc-finally-speeds-up-broadband#siteblog-comment-19&quot;&gt;new definitions&lt;/a&gt; of broadband.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
First Generation: 200 Kbps up to 768 Kbps&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Basic Broadband: 768 Kbps to 1.5 megabits per second
&lt;li&gt;1.5 Mbps to to less than 3 Mbps
&lt;li&gt;3 Mbps to less than 6 Mbps
&lt;li&gt;6 Mbps to less than 10 Mbps
&lt;li&gt;10 Mbps to less than 25 Mbps
&lt;li&gt;25 Mbps to less than 100.0 Mbps
&lt;li&gt;100 Mbps and beyond
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a major improvement over the old definition of &quot;200 kilobits&quot; as broadband.  By this old definition, the country has very high levels of broadband penetration, but made the U.S. the laughingstock of the rest of the world. In much of Europe, residential broadband tends to be north of 40+ MEGABITS, or about 200 times more capacity than the FCC definition.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The graded scale is useful because it can provided benchmarks to measure progress in a community or region.  If the FCC has provided targets, that would have been even better.  For example, a ten year target could be to have 90% of businesses and homes in the &quot;100 Mbps and beyond&quot; category, and indeed, U.S. community broadband projects like the one in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ndanville.net/&quot;&gt;Danville, Virginia are deploying &quot;100 Mbps and beyond&quot; today.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.designnine.com/news/node/1180#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.designnine.com/news/taxonomy/term/1">Broadband</category>
 <category domain="http://www.designnine.com/news/taxonomy/term/14">Policy and regulation</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:01:02 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>acohill</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1180 at http://www.designnine.com/news</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comcast to target users, not protocols</title>
 <link>http://www.designnine.com/news/node/1166</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Comcast has announced that it will &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macworld.com/article/133775/2008/06/comcast_p2p.html&quot;&gt;start slowing down&lt;/a&gt; the traffic of its broadband users if they are using too much; &quot;too much&quot; generally means running P2P (peer to peer) filesharing applications like BitTorrent, which can run for hours or days while sending or receiving large files (like movies or music).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The strategy is reasonable, given that cable companies price their Internet services in part based on average use.  Customers that far exceed those average use parameters slow things down for everyone else on that cable modem network segment, which often includes 100-200 neighbors.  Cable modem bandwidth, like most wireless services, is shared among all connected users at an access point (wireless) or a cable network mode.  Fortunately, not all users are doing something at the same time, but background applications like BitTorrent do run continuously for long periods of time.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.designnine.com/news/node/1166#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.designnine.com/news/taxonomy/term/14">Policy and regulation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.designnine.com/news/taxonomy/term/59">Network neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 10:07:42 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>acohill</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1166 at http://www.designnine.com/news</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Broadband Properties &#039;08:  FCC--Bandwidth doubling every two years</title>
 <link>http://www.designnine.com/news/node/1157</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;FCC Commissioner Deborah Tate spoke on the last day of the Broadband Properties conference.  She had some interesting statistics that should give pause to anyone who thinks that DSL and cable modem broadband services are &quot;good enough.&quot;  Commissioner Tate noted that:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Demand for bandwidth has been doubling every two years for the last ten years.
&lt;li&gt;By 2015 (just seven years from now), the FCC thinks bandwidth requirements will be fifty times (50x) what they are today.
&lt;li&gt;In Japan, where they have had 100 megabit connections to homes and businesses available for several years, they are already observing congestion--meaning 100 megabit pipes are already filling up.
&lt;li&gt;Americans are watching more than 10 billion videos per month over the Internet.
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tate went on to enumerate that choice was important to buyers of telecom services, and she listed that choice should be available for services, for providers, and for equipment.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.designnine.com/news/node/1157#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.designnine.com/news/taxonomy/term/1">Broadband</category>
 <category domain="http://www.designnine.com/news/taxonomy/term/14">Policy and regulation</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 12:32:52 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>acohill</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1157 at http://www.designnine.com/news</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Undersea cables were cut by improper anchoring</title>
 <link>http://www.designnine.com/news/node/1141</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The undersea fiber cables that were cut a couple of months ago were the subject of numerous conspiracy theories, but satellite photos have revealed the culprits--&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/Apr/13/ships_impounded_in_middle_east_cable_cuts.html&quot;&gt;cargo ships that were anchored in the wrong place&lt;/a&gt;.  Sometimes Occam&#039;s Razor (the simplest explanation is the likeliest one) is exactly right.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The object lesson for communities is to plan for cable outages by making sure local networks have redundant cable paths.  Sometimes this is quite expensive to do when just getting started with community telecom investments, so an alternative to a second fiber cable is a high capacity wireless link that can handle local traffic (perhaps with somewhat less throughput) while repairs are made.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.designnine.com/news/node/1141#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.designnine.com/news/taxonomy/term/14">Policy and regulation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.designnine.com/news/taxonomy/term/18">International</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 05:49:43 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>acohill</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1141 at http://www.designnine.com/news</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NY governor calls for universal broadband</title>
 <link>http://www.designnine.com/news/node/1079</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Eliot Spitzer, the governor of New York, has called for universal access to broadband in the state.  The text of his speech is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thealbanyproject.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=1697&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; (note that you have to scroll down past the agriculture remarks to get to the broadband stuff).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, Spitzer seems comfortable relegating rural areas to second class status.  He calls for a minimum of 100 megabit connectivity in urban areas, but says that just one-fifth of that (20 megabits) is fine for rural areas.  Cable and DSL are not going to provide universal access in rural parts of New York, so Spitzer has apparently decided that rural areas will have to make do with wireless while the cities get fiber.  Rural citizens and legislators in the state should be outraged that the governor is willing to choke their economic future so easily.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.designnine.com/news/node/1079#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.designnine.com/news/taxonomy/term/14">Policy and regulation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.designnine.com/news/taxonomy/term/45">New York</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 05:48:30 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>acohill</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1079 at http://www.designnine.com/news</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
